{
  "schemaVersion": 1,
  "slug": "kimi-hy4-creator-comparison",
  "publishedAt": "2026-11-07T04:36:10Z",
  "evaluatedAt": "2026-11-05–2026-11-06",
  "author": {
    "zh": "AI打工人小伊",
    "en": "AI Worker Xiaoyi"
  },
  "title": {
    "zh": "Kimi K3、K3.1 Pro 与混元 4，同题作品对比",
    "en": "Kimi K3, K3.1 Pro and Tencent Hy4 on the same creative tasks"
  },
  "description": {
    "zh": "两轮九题创作实测，展示海底洗衣店、复古掌机、网页、找不同、宝塔和鹈鹕骑车的原作图片与博主点评。K3.1 Pro 实测均为 Highspeed 版，保留混元 4 宝塔三次未交付的记录。",
    "en": "Two nine-task comparisons with original images and blogger commentary on Web3D, Blender, web apps, image understanding and SVG. Every tested K3.1 Pro run uses Highspeed, and Hy4's three incomplete pagoda attempts remain visible."
  },
  "intro": {
    "zh": [
      "同一道题，换一个模型，作品会差多少？我是 AI打工人小伊。这篇把两轮创作评测放到一起，先看 Kimi K3 对 K3.1 Pro，再让腾讯混元 4 做同一批题。",
      "K3.1 Pro 在两轮里用的都是 Highspeed 版。下面每题都配上作品图片和我的点评，喜欢的地方、明显的问题，以及没有交出来的作品，都留在记录里。"
    ],
    "en": [
      "How much does a finished work change when the model changes? I am AI Worker Xiaoyi. This page brings together two rounds, first Kimi K3 against K3.1 Pro, then Tencent Hy4 on the same tasks.",
      "Every K3.1 Pro run in these comparisons used Highspeed. Each task pairs images of the work with my commentary, including the details I liked, visible problems and missing deliveries."
    ]
  },
  "methods": [
    {
      "zh": "两轮均使用 Claude Code 作为执行环境，让模型写代码、运行工具并交付文件。Kimi 使用其原评测接口，Hy4 经 OpenRouter 接入正式模型 tencent/hy4。",
      "en": "Both rounds use Claude Code to write code, run tools and deliver files. Kimi uses its original evaluation route, while Hy4 uses the released tencent/hy4 model through OpenRouter."
    },
    {
      "zh": "每题对齐冻结题面和输入。找不同的两张图片由 ImageGen 生成，三款模型看到的是同一组图片。保留模型第一次自主完成的作品，局部放大与采集截图在图注中说明。",
      "en": "Frozen prompts and inputs are aligned task by task. The spot-the-difference pair was generated with ImageGen, and all three models saw the same images. Images come from the first autonomous deliveries, with crops and capture details identified in captions."
    },
    {
      "zh": "第一轮由原来的题目和后续补测组成，移除了未纳入点评的库存看板。第二轮复用同样九题，八题有双方作品，Hy4 的宝塔三次尝试都未交付可用结果。",
      "en": "The first round combines the original tasks with later additions and omits the inventory dashboard excluded from the review. The second reuses the same nine tasks, with paired work on eight and no usable Hy4 pagoda after three attempts."
    },
    {
      "zh": "点评依据我保存的逐题意见整理。找不同把位置命中和 A 到 B 的描述方向分开核对，动画静帧取相同采样时刻。统一导览通过验证的场景使用相同方向与角速度。",
      "en": "Commentary is polished from my saved task-by-task opinions. Difference locations and A-to-B description direction are checked separately. Animation stills use matching sample times, and scenes that passed unified capture use matching orbit direction and angular speed."
    }
  ],
  "rounds": [
    {
      "id": "kimi",
      "title": {
        "zh": "第一轮 · Kimi K3 对 K3.1 Pro Highspeed",
        "en": "Round 1 · Kimi K3 vs K3.1 Pro Highspeed"
      },
      "intro": {
        "zh": "这轮更容易看到新版在细节和页面设计上的变化。海底洗衣店、拆解掌机和宝塔值得拉近看，找不同则出现了定位和描述方向的反差。",
        "en": "This round makes the newer model's changes in detail and page design easier to see. The laundromat, exploded handheld and pagoda reward a closer look, while the image task separates location coverage from description direction."
      },
      "models": [
        {
          "id": "k3",
          "label": {
            "zh": "Kimi K3",
            "en": "Kimi K3"
          },
          "maker": {
            "zh": "月之暗面",
            "en": "Moonshot AI"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "k3.1-pro-highspeed",
          "label": {
            "zh": "Kimi K3.1 Pro（Highspeed）",
            "en": "Kimi K3.1 Pro (Highspeed)"
          },
          "maker": {
            "zh": "月之暗面",
            "en": "Moonshot AI"
          }
        }
      ],
      "summary": {
        "zh": "九道题里，有六道我更喜欢 K3.1 Pro Highspeed 的作品。找不同只按定位选 K3，图表和鹈鹕动画归在接近这一组。掌机从开始到交付，K3 用了 16 分 13 秒，高速版用了 5 分 34 秒；行李清单这次反过来，K3 为 2 分 48 秒，高速版为 4 分 41 秒。每个数字来自一次实际会话，包含工具和渲染。",
        "en": "I prefer K3.1 Pro Highspeed's work on six of the nine tasks. I choose K3 for difference-location coverage, while the chart and animated pelican are close. The handheld took 16 minutes 13 seconds for K3 and 5 minutes 34 seconds for Highspeed from start to delivery. The packing list went the other way, at 2 minutes 48 seconds for K3 and 4 minutes 41 seconds for Highspeed. Each figure comes from one actual session and includes tools and rendering."
      },
      "aggregate": [
        {
          "label": {
            "zh": "偏 K3.1 Pro Highspeed",
            "en": "Prefer K3.1 Pro Highspeed"
          },
          "count": 6
        },
        {
          "label": {
            "zh": "偏 K3 · 仅定位",
            "en": "Prefer K3 · location coverage"
          },
          "count": 1
        },
        {
          "label": {
            "zh": "总体接近",
            "en": "Close overall"
          },
          "count": 2
        }
      ],
      "cases": [
        {
          "id": "bookshelf",
          "title": {
            "zh": "参数化书架",
            "en": "Parametric bookshelf"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用 Blender 制作三格书架，再只把宽度从 800 改为 1000 毫米。",
            "en": "Build a three-compartment Blender bookshelf, then change only its width from 800 to 1,000 mm."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "两边的书架结构差不多，差别更多在材质。我更喜欢 K3.1 Pro Highspeed 的木纹，侧板的竖纹和层板的横纹都看得清楚。K3 的板面更光滑、朴素。",
            "en": "The two bookshelves look structurally similar. I prefer the wood material from K3.1 Pro Highspeed, with visible vertical grain on the side panels and horizontal grain on the shelves. K3 has a smoother, plainer finish."
          },
          "preference": "b",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "结构观感接近，材质偏好来自我的点评。",
              "en": "The structures look similar. The material preference is my own judgement."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "kimi-bookshelf",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "ff90425660dd8fe3355c38d0135da261182225ccb78a3e1101e798324e9e62d0",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "ff90425660dd8fe3355c38d0135da261182225ccb78a3e1101e798324e9e62d0",
            "sourceComparisonId": "kimi-k3-vs-k31pro-editorial-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 2
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "creator-web3d",
          "title": {
            "zh": "海底洗衣店",
            "en": "Underwater laundromat"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用 Web3D 制作三台滚筒洗衣机、水母和游鱼，形成可环视的海底洗衣店。",
            "en": "Build an orbitable Web3D underwater laundromat with three rotating washing machines, jellyfish and fish."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "这题我更喜欢 K3.1 Pro Highspeed，洗衣房更有空间层次，旋钮、按键和舱门框也更清楚。K3 的小鱼简单得有点可爱，但镜头转到侧面，滚筒门突出一大截，像挂了三个单反镜头。它的蓝色水母还把一段触须穿进了墙里。新版也有个好笑的细节，滚筒带着里面几片拨片一起转，看着有点像小螺旋桨。",
            "en": "I prefer K3.1 Pro Highspeed here. Its laundromat has more spatial depth and clearer knobs, buttons and door frames. K3 has charmingly simple fish, but a side view exposes drum doors that protrude like camera lenses. Part of a blue jellyfish tentacle also intersects the wall. The newer model has its own amusing detail, with internal drum paddles turning like a small propeller."
          },
          "preference": "b",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "K3 的蓝色水母触须在动画 1.2 秒处与右墙相交。",
              "en": "At 1.2 seconds, part of K3's blue jellyfish tentacle intersects the right wall."
            },
            {
              "zh": "两边的洗衣机近景取自同一动画时刻 2.7 秒，各自选择可看清部件的机位。",
              "en": "Both washing-machine close-ups are from 2.7 seconds, using a clear inspection viewpoint for each work."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "kimi-creator-web3d",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "1d8e4c8159b63056408c8017d725a2eecff18680cb5a7d49a9090d7bc3f5a213",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "1d8e4c8159b63056408c8017d725a2eecff18680cb5a7d49a9090d7bc3f5a213",
            "sourceComparisonId": "kimi-k3-vs-k31pro-editorial-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 2
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "creator-webapp",
          "title": {
            "zh": "旅行行李清单",
            "en": "Travel packing list"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "制作中文旅行清单，支持添加、勾选和删除，并适配手机。",
            "en": "Build a Chinese packing list with add, check and delete controls, plus a mobile layout."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "添加雨伞、勾选充电器、删除相机，两版都通过了这三步。看页面本身，我更喜欢 K3.1 Pro Highspeed，左侧有旅行插画，右侧列清单和打包进度，更像能拿来就用的小工具。K3 把表单和列表放在中间，功能够用，视觉上更朴素。",
            "en": "Both versions passed the same three operations, adding an umbrella, checking the charger and deleting the camera. I prefer K3.1 Pro Highspeed's page, with a travel illustration on the left and a list with packing progress on the right. It feels more ready to use. K3 centres the form and list in a plainer layout."
          },
          "preference": "b",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "两版均通过添加、勾选、删除的固定操作。",
              "en": "Both versions passed the fixed add, check and delete actions."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "kimi-creator-webapp",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "536486850d41f9a552c6cfc91d736d35a859b510fc8f91abbcd2d8e5fa1959a7",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "536486850d41f9a552c6cfc91d736d35a859b510fc8f91abbcd2d8e5fa1959a7",
            "sourceComparisonId": "kimi-k3-vs-k31pro-editorial-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 2
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "svg-dashboard",
          "title": {
            "zh": "季度收入图表",
            "en": "Quarterly revenue chart"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "按 12、24、18、30 四个季度收入画等比例柱状图，总计为 84。",
            "en": "Draw proportional bars for quarterly revenue of 12, 24, 18 and 30, with a total of 84."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "两张成品放在一起，我没有看出明显的视觉差距，可能这道题还不够难。不过核对题面时，K3 加了原题没给的 FY 2025 和百万单位。图表看着整齐，补充的信息仍要逐项核对。",
            "en": "Side by side, I do not see a clear visual advantage. This task may be too easy to separate them. Checking the prompt does reveal that K3 added FY 2025 and a millions unit that the task did not supply. A tidy chart still needs its labels checked."
          },
          "preference": "both",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "K3 增加了原题未提供的 FY 2025 和百万单位。",
              "en": "K3 added FY 2025 and a millions unit absent from the prompt."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "kimi-svg-dashboard",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "4f17ab9ef88c5a7ab884f9c2d5c1e2d58ae7b9d04eab19990686df29de123474",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "4f17ab9ef88c5a7ab884f9c2d5c1e2d58ae7b9d04eab19990686df29de123474",
            "sourceComparisonId": "kimi-k3-vs-k31pro-editorial-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 2
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "creator-handheld",
          "title": {
            "zh": "复古掌机分层拆解",
            "en": "Exploded retro handheld"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用 Blender 制作复古掌机及对应的分层拆解，交付工程和两张原图。",
            "en": "Create a retro handheld console and matching exploded view in Blender, with editable projects and two renders."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "两边都交了可以重新打开的组装、拆解工程。我更喜欢 K3.1 Pro Highspeed 的掌机，主板布线、芯片和固定件更好辨认，拆开后更有看头。K3 也给了我一个小惊喜，背壳旁还单独摆了几颗螺丝。",
            "en": "Both models delivered assembled and exploded projects that could be reopened. I prefer K3.1 Pro Highspeed's handheld, with clearer board traces, chips and fasteners that make the exploded view more interesting. K3 has a nice small touch too, with separate screws beside the rear shell."
          },
          "preference": "b",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "两版的组装和拆解 Blender 工程均已重新打开核验。",
              "en": "Both assembled and exploded Blender projects were reopened for verification."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "kimi-creator-handheld",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "b1503d76b21f93eea6d32d7a096ab7b333bbb7335d2e26be2699d0d3e19a26c0",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "b1503d76b21f93eea6d32d7a096ab7b333bbb7335d2e26be2699d0d3e19a26c0",
            "sourceComparisonId": "kimi-k3-vs-k31pro-editorial-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 2
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "creator-spot-difference",
          "title": {
            "zh": "两图找不同",
            "en": "Spot the differences"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "对照同一组 A、B 图片，框出最多五处变化，并说明从 A 到 B 怎么变。",
            "en": "Compare the same images A and B, locate up to five differences and describe each change from A to B."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "只看定位，我这题选 K3。五处差异它全框到了，K3.1 Pro Highspeed 框到四处，漏了收音机天线。逐条对照图 A 和图 B，K3 却把五处变化方向都写反了，方向正确为 0/5。K3.1 Pro Highspeed 报出的四处方向全对，为 4/4。找得全不全、说得对不对，这两个结果得一起看。",
            "en": "For location coverage alone, I choose K3. It located all five differences, while K3.1 Pro Highspeed found four and missed the radio antenna. But checking the descriptions against images A and B shows that K3 reversed all five changes, scoring 0/5 for direction. All four changes reported by K3.1 Pro Highspeed had the correct direction, or 4/4. Coverage and description accuracy give different views of the same result."
          },
          "preference": "a",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "位置命中为 K3 5/5、K3.1 Pro Highspeed 4/5。",
              "en": "Location matches were 5/5 for K3 and 4/5 for K3.1 Pro Highspeed."
            },
            {
              "zh": "逐条核对 A 到 B 的描述方向，K3 为 0/5，K3.1 Pro Highspeed 为 4/4。",
              "en": "A separate check of change direction gave K3 0/5 and K3.1 Pro Highspeed 4/4."
            },
            {
              "zh": "K3.1 Pro Highspeed 漏报了蓝色收音机顶部天线消失。",
              "en": "K3.1 Pro Highspeed missed the disappearing antenna on top of the blue radio."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "kimi-creator-spot-difference",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "a61aa26a6106af436cdeb15ad7180b8f4c94d23fdbd263d5191f7012a3a2e65b",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "a61aa26a6106af436cdeb15ad7180b8f4c94d23fdbd263d5191f7012a3a2e65b",
            "sourceComparisonId": "kimi-k3-vs-k31pro-editorial-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 2,
            "inputSha256": {
              "a": "aaaa974d56dd922fd1cd7f25259f15ec14825fb36daac05df1e237caaafc1a6f",
              "b": "877a12664efbc033c61eb623fdc405f76313ae90c26efa8ccef9900c52f8eee0"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "creator-pagoda",
          "title": {
            "zh": "五层宝塔寺院",
            "en": "Five-storey pagoda"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用 Three.js 制作可环视的五层宝塔、拱桥、水池、树木和灯笼。",
            "en": "Build an orbitable five-storey pagoda scene in Three.js, including an arched bridge, pond, trees and lanterns."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "这座宝塔我更喜欢 K3.1 Pro Highspeed，屋檐能看清一片片瓦，树冠更有层次，花瓣飘落也更自然。K3 做的是夜景，宝塔和树的造型简化了不少。用同样的方向和速度绕一圈，细节差距更容易看出来。",
            "en": "I prefer K3.1 Pro Highspeed's pagoda, with individually visible roof tiles, more layered tree canopies and more natural falling petals. K3 chose a night scene and simplified the tower and trees considerably. An orbit in the same direction and at the same rate makes those differences easier to inspect."
          },
          "preference": "b",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "三题补测来自独立批次，两边采用同题和 sync-v1 采集要求。",
              "en": "These three additional tasks came from separate runs with matching prompts and sync-v1 capture requirements."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "kimi-creator-pagoda",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "284167c87930e4928ca0d4a05f5c09e5a93d6c27b70c6beea898e4251b3c677a",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "19d9e9dbaf7bada3068499a828fa4fd8a569ecabf2a001d5d1aa75d05acc6aeb",
            "sourceComparisonId": "compare-70ab6fa0d1e24620",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 2
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "svg-pelican",
          "title": {
            "zh": "鹈鹕骑车 · 静态",
            "en": "Pelican on a bicycle · static"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用自包含的静态 SVG 画一只骑自行车的鹈鹕。",
            "en": "Draw a pelican riding a bicycle as a self-contained static SVG."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "K3 的鹈鹕连车把都没扶，像在表演撒把骑车。K3.1 Pro Highspeed 至少把翅膀伸到了车把边上，整体我更喜欢一些。不过一只脚和脚踏附近的线条叠在一起，看着还是有点穿插。",
            "en": "K3's pelican is not holding the handlebar, as if it is showing off hands-free riding. K3.1 Pro Highspeed at least reaches a wing towards the bar, and I prefer the overall result. One foot still overlaps the lines near the pedal awkwardly."
          },
          "preference": "b",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "图中展示的是模型提交的静态 SVG 的渲染结果。",
              "en": "The images are renders of the static SVG files delivered by the models."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "kimi-svg-pelican",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "aafe9c2106c7b9009444c0e9737ec814c04971377c739ac0c078495ceb625e08",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "aafe9c2106c7b9009444c0e9737ec814c04971377c739ac0c078495ceb625e08",
            "sourceComparisonId": "compare-70ab6fa0d1e24620",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 2
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "svg-pelican-animation",
          "title": {
            "zh": "鹈鹕骑车 · 动态",
            "en": "Pelican on a bicycle · animated"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用 SVG SMIL 制作四秒循环，让车轮、脚踏和鹈鹕双腿一起运动。",
            "en": "Use SVG SMIL for a four-second loop with rotating wheels and crank, plus moving pedalling legs."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "动画这题，两边我都觉得一般。翅膀都没搭在车把上，脚踩踏板的动作也不太自然。同步看开头四秒，K3 在第 4 秒回到了开场画面，K3.1 Pro Highspeed 这一刻的画面和开场不同。",
            "en": "Neither animation impresses me much. The wings do not reach the handlebars, and the pedalling looks unnatural. In the synchronised first four seconds, K3 returns to its starting image at the four-second boundary, while K3.1 Pro Highspeed differs from its starting image at that point."
          },
          "preference": "both",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "两份 SVG 按同一绝对时间采样开头四秒。",
              "en": "Both SVGs were sampled over the first four seconds on the same absolute timeline."
            },
            {
              "zh": "第 4 秒与开场比较，K3 一致，K3.1 Pro Highspeed 不同。",
              "en": "At the four-second boundary, K3 matched its starting frame and K3.1 Pro Highspeed did not."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "kimi-svg-pelican-animation",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "76a105f6b46abbc93352a95e2a993ced108b9f2ae5b38f868e3c759d6098b6bb",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "76a105f6b46abbc93352a95e2a993ced108b9f2ae5b38f868e3c759d6098b6bb",
            "sourceComparisonId": "compare-70ab6fa0d1e24620",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 2
          }
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "hy4",
      "title": {
        "zh": "第二轮 · 混元 4 对 K3.1 Pro Highspeed",
        "en": "Round 2 · Tencent Hy4 vs K3.1 Pro Highspeed"
      },
      "intro": {
        "zh": "混元 4 这轮有些地方让我意外，尤其是找不同和洗衣机的细节。前端页面和静态鹈鹕，我还是更喜欢 Kimi。宝塔没能交出来，也一起放进这轮记录。",
        "en": "Hy4 surprised me in places, especially on the image task and the washing-machine detail. I still prefer Kimi's web page and static pelican. The undelivered pagoda also remains part of this round."
      },
      "models": [
        {
          "id": "tencent/hy4",
          "label": {
            "zh": "腾讯 Hy4 正式版",
            "en": "Tencent Hy4 (release)"
          },
          "maker": {
            "zh": "腾讯混元",
            "en": "Tencent Hunyuan"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "k3.1-pro-highspeed",
          "label": {
            "zh": "Kimi K3.1 Pro（Highspeed）",
            "en": "Kimi K3.1 Pro (Highspeed)"
          },
          "maker": {
            "zh": "月之暗面",
            "en": "Moonshot AI"
          }
        }
      ],
      "summary": {
        "zh": "八题有双方交付的作品里，我三题偏混元 4、两题偏 Kimi、三题觉得接近。混元 4 的宝塔记为未完成。复古掌机这题，混元 4 从开始到交付用了 30 分 57 秒，Kimi Highspeed 为 5 分 34 秒，包含代码、工具、渲染和等待。两边接入渠道不同，这组时间描述的是这两次完整运行。",
        "en": "Among the eight tasks with work from both models, I lean towards Hy4 on three, Kimi on two, and call three close. Hy4's pagoda is recorded as incomplete. The retro handheld took Hy4 30 minutes 57 seconds from start to delivery, compared with 5 minutes 34 seconds for Kimi Highspeed, including coding, tools, rendering and waiting. The routes differ, and these times describe those two complete runs."
      },
      "aggregate": [
        {
          "label": {
            "zh": "偏混元 4",
            "en": "Prefer Hy4"
          },
          "count": 3
        },
        {
          "label": {
            "zh": "偏 Kimi",
            "en": "Prefer Kimi"
          },
          "count": 2
        },
        {
          "label": {
            "zh": "总体接近",
            "en": "Close overall"
          },
          "count": 3
        }
      ],
      "cases": [
        {
          "id": "bookshelf",
          "title": {
            "zh": "参数化书架",
            "en": "Parametric bookshelf"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用 Blender 制作三格书架，再只把宽度从 800 改为 1000 毫米。",
            "en": "Build a three-compartment Blender bookshelf, then change only its width from 800 to 1,000 mm."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "这题我觉得不相上下。两边的书架摆在一起，没看出明显的长短板。结构和完成度都比较接近，靠这道题还很难选出我更喜欢哪一个。",
            "en": "I see this one as close. With the two bookshelves side by side, neither has an obvious advantage for me. Their structure and overall finish are similar enough that this task does not give me a clear preference."
          },
          "preference": "both",
          "facts": [],
          "figureId": "hy4-bookshelf",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "ff90425660dd8fe3355c38d0135da261182225ccb78a3e1101e798324e9e62d0",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "ff90425660dd8fe3355c38d0135da261182225ccb78a3e1101e798324e9e62d0",
            "sourceComparisonId": "hy4-vs-kimi-k31pro-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 1
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "creator-web3d",
          "title": {
            "zh": "海底洗衣店",
            "en": "Underwater laundromat"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用 Web3D 制作三台滚筒洗衣机、水母和游鱼，形成可环视的海底洗衣店。",
            "en": "Build an orbitable Web3D underwater laundromat with three rotating washing machines, jellyfish and fish."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "坦白讲，两边的风格有点相似，整体水平也比较接近。我更喜欢混元 4 的洗衣机，滚筒门和控制面板更像真机。Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed 则多了些生活里的小巧思，比如旁边的小凳、放着叠好衣服的小台。这题我略偏混元 4。",
            "en": "The two scenes have a similar feel and are fairly close overall. I prefer Hy4's washing machines, whose drum doors and control panels look more like real appliances. Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed adds small everyday touches, including a stool and a table with folded clothes. I lean slightly towards Hy4 here."
          },
          "preference": "a",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "两份海底洗衣店原作均完成隔离浏览器采集。",
              "en": "Both original laundromat scenes were captured in an isolated browser."
            },
            {
              "zh": "这题的统一相机采集未通过验证，图像保留各自原作机位。",
              "en": "Unified camera capture did not pass verification for this task, so the images retain each work's original viewpoint."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "hy4-creator-web3d",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "1d8e4c8159b63056408c8017d725a2eecff18680cb5a7d49a9090d7bc3f5a213",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "1d8e4c8159b63056408c8017d725a2eecff18680cb5a7d49a9090d7bc3f5a213",
            "sourceComparisonId": "hy4-vs-kimi-k31pro-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 1
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "creator-webapp",
          "title": {
            "zh": "旅行行李清单",
            "en": "Travel packing list"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "制作中文旅行清单，支持添加、勾选和删除，并适配手机。",
            "en": "Build a Chinese packing list with add, check and delete controls, plus a mobile layout."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed 的前端审美和设计感，我还是更喜欢一些。混元 4 把清单功能做出来了，但页面比较平平无奇。都是同样的添加、勾选、删除，Kimi 的界面更有成品感。",
            "en": "I still prefer Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed's frontend styling and design. Hy4 delivered the list functionality, but its page feels more ordinary. With the same add, check and delete actions, Kimi's interface feels more finished to me."
          },
          "preference": "b",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "双方原作均通过添加雨伞、勾选充电器、删除相机的固定操作。",
              "en": "Both original apps passed adding an umbrella, checking the charger and deleting the camera."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "hy4-creator-webapp",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "536486850d41f9a552c6cfc91d736d35a859b510fc8f91abbcd2d8e5fa1959a7",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "536486850d41f9a552c6cfc91d736d35a859b510fc8f91abbcd2d8e5fa1959a7",
            "sourceComparisonId": "hy4-vs-kimi-k31pro-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 1
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "svg-dashboard",
          "title": {
            "zh": "季度收入图表",
            "en": "Quarterly revenue chart"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "按 12、24、18、30 四个季度收入画等比例柱状图，总计为 84。",
            "en": "Draw proportional bars for quarterly revenue of 12, 24, 18 and 30, with a total of 84."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "两张图的水平基本一致。混元 4 的颜色对比更突出，我看起来觉得更好理解一些。这是配色上的偏好，整体仍归在接近这一组。",
            "en": "The two charts are broadly comparable. Hy4 uses stronger colour contrast, which I find a little easier to read. That is a colour preference, and I still group the overall result as close."
          },
          "preference": "both",
          "facts": [],
          "figureId": "hy4-svg-dashboard",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "4f17ab9ef88c5a7ab884f9c2d5c1e2d58ae7b9d04eab19990686df29de123474",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "4f17ab9ef88c5a7ab884f9c2d5c1e2d58ae7b9d04eab19990686df29de123474",
            "sourceComparisonId": "hy4-vs-kimi-k31pro-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 1
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "creator-handheld",
          "title": {
            "zh": "复古掌机分层拆解",
            "en": "Exploded retro handheld"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用 Blender 制作复古掌机及对应的分层拆解，交付工程和两张原图。",
            "en": "Create a retro handheld console and matching exploded view in Blender, with editable projects and two renders."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "这两台掌机没有明显的优劣，我把它们归在接近这一组。真要挑一台，我会稍微偏 K3.1 Pro Highspeed，因为屏幕看起来更大一些。这更多是我对造型比例的偏好。",
            "en": "Neither handheld has a clear overall advantage for me, so I group them as close. If I had to pick one, I would lean a little towards K3.1 Pro Highspeed because its screen looks larger. That is mainly my preference for the proportions."
          },
          "preference": "both",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "双方组装和拆解工程均已重新打开，拆解图包含设备主体部件。",
              "en": "Both assembled and exploded projects were reopened, with the main device components present in the exploded views."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "hy4-creator-handheld",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "b1503d76b21f93eea6d32d7a096ab7b333bbb7335d2e26be2699d0d3e19a26c0",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "b1503d76b21f93eea6d32d7a096ab7b333bbb7335d2e26be2699d0d3e19a26c0",
            "sourceComparisonId": "hy4-vs-kimi-k31pro-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 1
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "creator-spot-difference",
          "title": {
            "zh": "两图找不同",
            "en": "Spot the differences"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "对照同一组 A、B 图片，框出最多五处变化，并说明从 A 到 B 怎么变。",
            "en": "Compare the same images A and B, locate up to five differences and describe each change from A to B."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "混元 4 这次把五处差异都定位到了，Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed 找到四处，漏掉了收音机上消失的天线。这是这轮让我最惊喜的一题。只看这组图，混元 4 找得更完整，我这题选它。",
            "en": "Hy4 located all five differences this time. Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed found four and missed the antenna disappearing from the radio. This was the biggest pleasant surprise of the round for me. On this image pair, Hy4 covered the changes more completely, so I choose it here."
          },
          "preference": "a",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "同一组题图，位置命中为 Hy4 5/5、Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed 4/5。",
              "en": "On the same image pair, location matches were 5/5 for Hy4 and 4/5 for Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed."
            },
            {
              "zh": "双方均没有额外的有效框，Kimi 漏报收音机天线。",
              "en": "Neither model added extra valid boxes. Kimi missed the radio antenna."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "hy4-creator-spot-difference",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "a61aa26a6106af436cdeb15ad7180b8f4c94d23fdbd263d5191f7012a3a2e65b",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "a61aa26a6106af436cdeb15ad7180b8f4c94d23fdbd263d5191f7012a3a2e65b",
            "sourceComparisonId": "hy4-vs-kimi-k31pro-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 1,
            "inputSha256": {
              "a": "aaaa974d56dd922fd1cd7f25259f15ec14825fb36daac05df1e237caaafc1a6f",
              "b": "877a12664efbc033c61eb623fdc405f76313ae90c26efa8ccef9900c52f8eee0"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "creator-pagoda",
          "title": {
            "zh": "五层宝塔寺院",
            "en": "Five-storey pagoda"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用 Three.js 制作可环视的五层宝塔、拱桥、水池、树木和灯笼。",
            "en": "Build an orbitable five-storey pagoda scene in Three.js, including an arched bridge, pond, trees and lanterns."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "宝塔这题，混元 4 在同一题面下尝试了三次。三次都在接口返回 refusal 后结束，未交付可用作品。右侧保留 Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed 的宝塔作为同题参照，混元这一项记为未完成。",
            "en": "Hy4 had three attempts at the same pagoda task. Each ended after the interface returned refusal, without a usable delivered scene. The right-hand image retains Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed's pagoda as a reference for the same task. Hy4 is recorded as incomplete here."
          },
          "preference": "unavailable",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "三次独立尝试使用相同原题字节和相同 sync-v1 规格。",
              "en": "The three separate attempts used identical original prompt bytes and the same sync-v1 specification."
            },
            {
              "zh": "三次终态均记录 stop_reason 为 refusal，且没有 index.html 与 README.md 交付。",
              "en": "All three final results recorded stop_reason as refusal, without delivered index.html or README.md files."
            },
            {
              "zh": "日志没有说明触发拒绝的具体原因。",
              "en": "The logs do not identify the specific cause of the refusal."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "hy4-creator-pagoda",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "284167c87930e4928ca0d4a05f5c09e5a93d6c27b70c6beea898e4251b3c677a",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "19d9e9dbaf7bada3068499a828fa4fd8a569ecabf2a001d5d1aa75d05acc6aeb",
            "sourceComparisonId": "hy4-vs-kimi-k31pro-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": null,
            "attempts": [
              {
                "id": "batch",
                "status": "interrupted",
                "stopReason": "refusal",
                "wallMs": 423190
              },
              {
                "id": "pagoda-identical-retry",
                "status": "interrupted",
                "stopReason": "refusal",
                "wallMs": 129467
              },
              {
                "id": "pagoda-third-attempt",
                "status": "interrupted",
                "stopReason": "refusal",
                "wallMs": 164050
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "svg-pelican",
          "title": {
            "zh": "鹈鹕骑车 · 静态",
            "en": "Pelican on a bicycle · static"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用自包含的静态 SVG 画一只骑自行车的鹈鹕。",
            "en": "Draw a pelican riding a bicycle as a self-contained static SVG."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "混元 4 的自行车细节和审美不错，但鹈鹕伸向车把的翅膀，看起来像从脖子后面接出来。脚、脚踏和车架的线条也挤在一起，姿势很别扭。Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed 也有脚部线条穿插的问题，但这张静态图我更喜欢它。",
            "en": "Hy4's bicycle has attractive detail, but the wing reaching towards the handlebar appears to emerge from behind the neck. The foot, pedal and frame lines overlap awkwardly too. Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed also has overlapping lines near a foot, but I prefer its static image."
          },
          "preference": "b",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "细节图来自各自原始 SVG 渲染图的局部裁切。",
              "en": "The detail images are crops of each model's original SVG render."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "hy4-svg-pelican",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "aafe9c2106c7b9009444c0e9737ec814c04971377c739ac0c078495ceb625e08",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "aafe9c2106c7b9009444c0e9737ec814c04971377c739ac0c078495ceb625e08",
            "sourceComparisonId": "hy4-vs-kimi-k31pro-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 1
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "svg-pelican-animation",
          "title": {
            "zh": "鹈鹕骑车 · 动态",
            "en": "Pelican on a bicycle · animated"
          },
          "prompt": {
            "zh": "用 SVG SMIL 制作四秒循环，让车轮、脚踏和鹈鹕双腿一起运动。",
            "en": "Use SVG SMIL for a four-second loop with rotating wheels and crank, plus moving pedalling legs."
          },
          "review": {
            "zh": "动画里，两边的腿和脚踩得都不太自然。不过混元 4 至少把扶车把的手画出来了，这一点让动作更容易读懂。这题我更偏它，双腿和脚踏的连接仍有改进空间。",
            "en": "In the animations, the legs and pedalling look unnatural in both versions. Hy4 at least draws the hands holding the handlebar, which makes the action easier to read. I lean towards it here, while the connection between the legs and pedals still needs work."
          },
          "preference": "a",
          "facts": [
            {
              "zh": "两份动态 SVG 按同一逻辑秒采样开头四秒，页面以同步时刻静帧展示。",
              "en": "The two animated SVGs were sampled at matching logical times over the first four seconds and are shown as still frames from matching times."
            }
          ],
          "figureId": "hy4-svg-pelican-animation",
          "evidence": {
            "caseSpecSha256": "76a105f6b46abbc93352a95e2a993ced108b9f2ae5b38f868e3c759d6098b6bb",
            "baseCaseSpecSha256": "76a105f6b46abbc93352a95e2a993ced108b9f2ae5b38f868e3c759d6098b6bb",
            "sourceComparisonId": "hy4-vs-kimi-k31pro-20261106",
            "sourceReviewRevision": 1
          }
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "finalSummary": {
    "zh": "这两轮里，我最看重新模型能否把具体作品做得更好。K3.1 Pro Highspeed 的细节和前端设计更合我的偏好，混元 4 在这组找不同里找得更全，洗衣机也有让我喜欢的细节。价格和等待时间会影响日常选择，最后还是得把喜欢的成品、能接受的缺点和自己的预算放在一起看。",
    "en": "Across these rounds, I care most about whether a model makes the particular work better. K3.1 Pro Highspeed's detail and frontend design suit my taste, while Hy4 covered this difference pair more completely and delivered washing-machine details I liked. Price and waiting time affect everyday use, so my choice balances the work I prefer, the flaws I can accept and my budget."
  },
  "notes": [
    {
      "zh": "这些计数汇总的是我对本次作品的已保存偏好，找不同的位置与方向另列可核对事实。",
      "en": "The counts summarise my saved preferences for these particular works. Difference locations and description direction are listed separately as checkable facts."
    },
    {
      "zh": "价格可参考同一腾讯云 TokenHub 广州后付费目录，截至 2026 年 11 月 7 日，Hy4 每百万 token 普通输入 6 元、输出 18 元，K3.1 Pro Highspeed 为 26 元和 136 元。Hy4 该平台限时五折至 2026 年 12 月 31 日。此次评测的接入渠道和实际账单另有口径。",
      "en": "For price context, Tencent Cloud TokenHub's Guangzhou pay-as-you-go list on 7 November 2026 quotes RMB 6 input and RMB 18 output per million tokens for Hy4, and RMB 26 and RMB 136 for K3.1 Pro Highspeed. Hy4 has a 50% promotion there through 31 December 2026. The routes and actual billing used for these evaluations have their own terms."
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "kimi-release",
      "title": {
        "zh": "Kimi K3.1 Pro 官方发布说明",
        "en": "Official Kimi K3.1 Pro release"
      },
      "url": "https://www.kimi.ai/blog/kimi-k3-1-pro"
    },
    {
      "id": "hy4-release",
      "title": {
        "zh": "腾讯 Hy4 正式版发布说明",
        "en": "Official Tencent Hy4 release"
      },
      "url": "https://www.tencent.com/zh-cn/tencent-launches-hy4-joining-the-ranks-of-the-worlds-leading-open-source-ai-models/"
    },
    {
      "id": "tokenhub-pricing",
      "title": {
        "zh": "腾讯云 TokenHub 后付费价格",
        "en": "Tencent Cloud TokenHub pay-as-you-go pricing"
      },
      "url": "https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1823/130055/"
    },
    {
      "id": "kimi-pricing",
      "title": {
        "zh": "Kimi 官方 API 价格",
        "en": "Official Kimi API pricing"
      },
      "url": "https://www.kimi.com/resources/kimi-k3-1-pro-pricing"
    }
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "reviewSources": [
      {
        "id": "kimi-main",
        "comparisonId": "kimi-k3-vs-k31pro-editorial-20261106",
        "revision": 2,
        "updatedAt": "2026-11-06T06:35:55.896344+00:00",
        "sha256": "6cfe624979105ddefbb402b7e87bbb2039c67df9590ff52648bc665245fca3e9"
      },
      {
        "id": "kimi-addons",
        "comparisonId": "compare-70ab6fa0d1e24620",
        "revision": 2,
        "updatedAt": "2026-11-06T07:45:57.758706+00:00",
        "sha256": "e83eef89f4b74fb9106082523d5560fefe2995fb276e1d8c7c4a974ad99f6859"
      },
      {
        "id": "hy4",
        "comparisonId": "hy4-vs-kimi-k31pro-20261106",
        "revision": 1,
        "updatedAt": "2026-11-06T14:21:55.646540+00:00",
        "sha256": "bb7dfd8c88312fe0c9ac7dd91cd60fe2be69ff58a9161ae7ee1fe8bf768cfae5"
      }
    ],
    "narrativeSources": [
      {
        "id": "article",
        "packageId": "review-2-nine-reviewed-20261106",
        "sha256": "f4f0184998caae9eb3844c6a85bf5550ea2ee37ba538ad1186af7ba88f05d846"
      },
      {
        "id": "narration",
        "packageId": "review-2-nine-reviewed-20261106",
        "sha256": "f50b5383d578f6867d6c3056c02ea2c095063b916994226dd33a71a9d8bfc836"
      }
    ],
    "caseSpecVerificationSha256": "bd314f4b50ecd4d54abd805898b7be6a805a088fbc07918f5f7b57a8707eb044"
  }
}